Oropharyngeal and esophageal candidiasis are common . The majority of infection
is caused by Candida albicans.
Fluconazole (or azole) resistance is predominantly the consequence of previous
exposure to fluconazole (or other azoles), particularly repeated and long-term
exposure . In this setting, C. albicans
resistance has been accompanied by a gradual emergence of non-albicans
Candida species, particularly
C. glabrata, as a cause of refractory mucosal candidiasis, particularly
in patients with advanced immunosuppression
The
occurrence of oropharyngeal or esophageal candidiasis is recognized as an
indicator of immune suppression, and these are most often observed in patients
with CD4+ T lymphocyte counts <200 cells/µL.
In contrast, vulvovaginal candidiasis is common among healthy, adult women and
is unrelated to HIV-1 status. Recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis alone should
not be considered a sentinel of HIV-1 infection among women. The introduction
of ART has led to a dramatic decline in the prevalence of oropharyngeal
candidiasis and a marked diminution in cases of refractory disease.
Clinical
Manifestations
Oropharyngeal
candidiasis is characterized by painless, creamy white, plaque-like lesions of
the buccal or oropharyngeal mucosa or tongue surface. Lesions can be easily
scraped off with a tongue depressor or other instrument. Less commonly,
erythematous patches without white plaques can be seen on the anterior or
posterior upper palate or diffusely on the tongue. Angular chelosis is also
noted on occasion and may be caused by Candida.
Esophageal
candidiasis is occasionally asymptomatic but often presents with fever,
retrosternal burning pain or discomfort, and odynophagia. Endoscopic
examination reveals whitish plaques similar to those observed with
oropharyngeal disease that might progress to superficial ulceration of the
esophageal mucosa, with central or surface whitish exudates.
Vulvovaginitis
might be mild to moderate and sporadic, similar in presentation to that in
normal hosts, and characterized by a creamy to yellow-white adherent vaginal
discharge associated with mucosal burning and itching. In those with more
advanced immunosuppression, episodes might be more severe, more frequently
recurrent, of longer duration, or refractory to treatment.
Diagnosis
Diagnosis
of oropharyngeal candidiasis is usually clinical and based on the appearance of
lesions. The feature that distinguishes these from oral hairy leukoplakia is
the ability to scrape off the superficial whitish plaques. If laboratory
confirmation is required, a scraping for microscopic examination for yeast
forms using a potassium hydroxide (KOH) preparation provides supportive
diagnostic information. Cultures of clinical material identify the species of
yeast present.
The
diagnosis of esophageal candidiasis requires endoscopic visualization of
lesions with histopathologic demonstration of characteristic
Candida yeast forms in tissue and culture confirmation of the presence
of Candida species. The diagnosis of
vulvovaginal candidiasis is based on the clinical presentation coupled with the
demonstration of characteristic yeast forms in vaginal secretions examined
microscopically after KOH preparation. Culture confirmation is rarely required
but might provide supportive information. Because self-diagnosis of
vulvovaginitis is unreliable, microscopic confirmation is required to avoid
unnecessary exposure to inappropriate treatments.
Treatment
Recommendations
Although
initial episodes of oropharyngeal candidiasis can be adequately treated with
topical therapy, including clotrimazole troches or nystatin suspension or
pastilles (BII), oral fluconazole
is as effective and, in certain studies, superior to topical therapy and is
more convenient and generally better tolerated
(AI). Itraconazole oral
solution for 7--14 days is as effective as oral fluconazole but less well
tolerated (AI). Ketoconazole and
itraconazole capsules are less effective than fluconazole because of their more
variable absorption and should be considered second line alternatives (DII).
Systemic
therapy is required for effective treatment of esophageal candidiasis (AII).
A 14--21-day course of either fluconazole or itraconazole solution is highly
effective (AI). As with
oropharyngeal candidiasis, ketoconazole and itraconazole capsules are less
effective than fluconazole because of variable absorption (DII).
Although caspofungin (AII) and
voriconazole (AII) are effective in
treating esophageal candidiasis among HIV-1--infected patients, experience is
limited and fluconazole remains the preferred agent. Although symptoms of
esophageal candidiasis might be mimicked by other pathogens, a diagnostic trial
of antifungal therapy is often appropriate before endoscopy is undertaken to
search for other causes of esophagitis.
Uncomplicated
vulvovaginal candidiasis is observed in 90% of HIV-1--infected women and
responds readily to short-course oral or topical treatment with any of several
therapies including single-dose regimens (AII):
-
topical azoles (clotrimazole, butaconazole, miconazole, ticonazole, or
terconazole) for 3--7 days;
-
topical nystatin 100,000 units daily for 14 days;
-
itraconazole oral solution 200 mg twice a day for 1 day or 200 mg daily for 3
days; or
-
oral fluconazole 150 mg for 1 dose.
Complicated
vaginitis (prolonged or refractory episodes) is observed in approximately 10%
of patients and requires antimycotic therapy for >7 days (AII).
Monitoring
and Adverse Events
For
the majority of patients, response to therapy is rapid, with improvement in
signs and symptoms within 48--72 hours. Short courses of topical therapy rarely
result in adverse effects, although patients might experience cutaneous
hypersensitivity reactions, with rash and pruritis. Patients might experience
gastrointestinal upset with oral azole treatment. Patients treated for
>7--10 days with azoles might experience hepatotoxicity. If prolonged
therapy is anticipated (>21 days), periodic monitoring of liver chemistry
studies should be considered.
Management
of Treatment Failure
Treatment
failure is generally defined as
signs and symptoms of oropharyngeal or esophageal candidiasis that persist for
more than 7--14 days of appropriate therapy. Fluconazole-refractory
oropharyngeal candidiasis will respond at least transiently to itraconazole
solution in approximately two thirds of persons (AII).
Amphotericin B oral suspension (1 mL four times daily of the 100 mg/mL
suspension) is sometimes effective among patients with oropharyngeal
candidiasis who do not respond to itraconazole (CIII);
however, this product is not available in the United States. Intravenous
amphotericin B is usually effective and can be used among patients with
refractory disease (BII).
Fluconazole-refractory esophageal candidiasis should be treated with
caspofungin (BIII) or intravenous
amphotericin B, either conventional or liposomal or lipid complex formulations
(BII).
Prevention
of Recurrence
The
majority of HIV specialists do not recommend secondary prophylaxis (chronic
maintenance therapy) of recurrent oropharyngeal or vulvovaginal candidiasis
because of the effectiveness of therapy for acute disease, the low mortality
associated with mucosal candidiasis, the potential for resistant
Candida organisms to develop, the possibility of drug interactions, and
the cost of prophylaxis (DIII).
However, if recurrences are frequent or severe, an oral azole, fluconazole (CI),
or itraconazole solution (CI) (or
for recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis, daily prophylaxis with any topical
azole [CII]) should be considered.
Other factors that influence choices related to such therapy include impact of
recurrences on the patient's well-being and quality of life, need for
prophylaxis for other fungal infections, cost, toxicities, drug interactions,
nutritional status, and potential to induce drug resistance among
Candida and other fungi.
Prolonged
use of systemically absorbed azoles, specifically among patients with low CD4+
T lymphocyte counts (i.e., <100 cells/µL)
increases the risk for developing azole resistance. Adults or adolescents who
have a history of one or more episodes of documented esophageal candidiasis
should be considered candidates for secondary prophylaxis. Fluconazole 100--200
mg daily is appropriate (BI).
However, potential azole resistance should be considered when long-term azoles
are considered.
Special
Considerations During Pregnancy
Pregnancy
increases the risk for vaginal colonization with
Candida species. Diagnosis of oropharyngeal, esophageal, and
vulvovaginal candidiasis is the same as among nonpregnant adults.
Fluconazole
is teratogenic in high doses in animal studies . Among humans, four cases of an
unusual cluster of defects (i.e., craniofacial and skeletal) have been reported
after prolonged use at high doses in the first trimester of pregnancy .
Teratogenic effects have not been described among animals at doses similar to
those used in humans, and anomalies do not appear to be increased among infants
born to women receiving single-dose fluconazole treatment in the first
trimester.
Itraconazole
is teratogenic among rats and mice (i.e., skeletal defects, encephalocele, and
macroglossia) at high doses . Similar to fluconazole, no increase in anomalies
has been noted among women exposed to treatment doses in the first trimester.
Invasive
or refractory esophageal Candida infections
should be treated the same in pregnancy as in the nonpregnant woman, with the
exception that amphotericin B should be substituted for fluconazole or
itraconazole (if indicated) in the first trimester if similar efficacy is to be
expected (BIII).